Resource Centers
Special Sections
-
Presented by
-
From
-
Sponsored by
is your arsenal for developing and maintaining sound financial plans and business strategy.
Inside: Budgeting | Compensation | Valuation
Free Trial: Intuit QuickBooks
Simple Start Free Edition 2009 for Windows
Departments
Newsletters
Help Me...
Fresh Inc. - The Inc.com Weblog
Staff Blog Menu
Regular Features
Recent Entries
More With Less, Resolutions and the New Thrift
Fighting Nasty Computer Viruses
Obama, Steve Jobs, and Hiring in a Tough Economy
Community Banks, Viral Marketing and More Spending Declines
Last-Minute Gifts for the Office
Arianna Huffington and Om Malick Share Their Tips on How to Blog
Digg, Credit Cards and Cutbacks
Inc. Recommends
Archives
January 14, 2004
Googlewashing
Posted by Carole Matthews at 10:48 AM
Seems that all of this webblogging isn't doing much for Google. Apparently, terms that are bandied about in webblogs tend to show up higher in the ranks than the document from which the term was originally derived. This "googlewashing," as described by Danny Sullivan in a ClickZ article today, makes it much more difficult to find a legitimate site for a term since the most relevant sites seem to be pushed to the bottom of the pile.
Honestly, I can't remember the last time I found the most relevant site for a term on page one of a Google search. I've had to increasingly dive into at least page two if not deeper before finding something of real substance. Have you had the same problems? What search engines do you use?
Try a RISK-FREE Issue of Inc. Today!
still using google, but I've also noticed bad results in the last several months. Skipping the first few pages of results has become commonplace, reminds me of altavista.
It seems as Google Adwords becomes more popular that general search results get worse. Google is still my engine of choice, but you are right, it's getting harder to find what what I want.
Speaking of Adwords (noticed your ad for it just left of this dialog box), it is doing a much better job of matching search context. Google's Adsense program is becoming a useful site navigation tool. Is the lack of quality search engine results a tool to drive Adword revenue?
Best regards,
Justin Hitt
Consultant, Author & Speaker
http://iunctura.com/weblog
I always find the result I need on the first page. Just use drilling down. Want to find a church in Toronto pastor'd by John Arnott?
"church" "john arnott" "toronto"
Bang. Bad example, I know, but the best I could come up with on short notice.
You might want to try Vivisimo. They use categories to organize the results from a group of search engines (Google, Altavista.)
Until November's "Florida" update, Google was a great example of a "Purple Cow." Like other companies in Seth Godin's recent book, Google grew because it offered a great product that was so different from its competition (i.e. generated the best search results) that it was a no-brainer resource. In November, Google did a massive overhaul of its algorythm and I'm not sure who benefitted, including Google, which may increase its pre-IPO valuation with increased AdWords revenue, but is certain to lose a large number of loyal followers. Never a long term winning strategy!
I use dozens of searches every day to do research for my business. In many cases, I'm looking for the official web site of a city or town, and I am contantly amazed by the proliferation of gargage sites that have been search engine optimized to take advantage of the AdWords affiliate program. More often than not, I find a number of them before the official web site!
Right now, Google, Yahoo! and AOL's results all rely on Google's algorythm. Shortly, Yahoo! will begin using Inktomi search results (it bought the search company and is terminating just terminated its agreement with Google). Microsoft is also investing cash from its huge reserves and you can be sure MSN's search will be killer by the end of the year. Rumors are flying that eBay may enter the game, too.
For now, I use Google and often find myself clicking AdWord links. Next, I go to MSN and sometimes make my way to www.metacrawler.com.
The people at Google are very smart, but going through huge growth and the inevitable change in culture that comes when needed controls are put in place. Let's hope they get their act together fast so we can get back to the level of productivity we used to enjoy with our search results. Otherwise, can you say MS Search?
Ellen,
Your comments about the search engine giants was very helpful..
rh
There are a number of sites that provide good content and free enewsletters which can keep you up to date with search engine marketing.
Good sites are www.searchenginewatch.com and www.webpronews.com.
By the way, just read MSN has just switched from using Looksmart to Inktomi results. That's the kind of stuff you learn through these newsletters.
Ellen
I use Google instinctively, but I have noticed that after the latest revision there do seem to be more problems. There are lots of Google optimized sites that are simply links pages and have no relevant content whatsoever on the topic being searched. I thought that Google automatically banned those sites...
Re Google... Search Engine Optimization expert Michael Campbell says that he prefers Inktomi for ecommerce purposes now... less competition.
His comments are here...
http://1stHowToWorkAtHome.com/NothingButNet
RE: Altavista.
I've been using Altavista since it was launched. The results of my searches with Altavista compared to Google's results have always been much better. For those who do a lot of searching, I recommend buying a copy of Copernic Agent Pro from Copernic.com. Try the demo. You'll like it.
My primary search engine is Google. I changed my preferences from 10 results to 100 results. This allows me to scan across more results versus the top 10.
I cannot imagine what life would be like without Google.
Post Your Own Comments